Vince Cable protests Trump visit

Liberal Democrat leader Vince Cable has demanded that Theresa May cancels the expected government to government summit with the “evil racist” Donald Trump.

Vince Cable said:

“Many of us warned when Theresa May walked hand in hand with Donald Trump that any relationship with such a racist was bound to end badly.

“But the prime minister, desperate for a trade deal, ignored the advice from across the political spectrum.

“Britain is now paying the price for her bad misjudgement. Theresa May’s extreme Brexit has alienated our European allies and now she has lost her last remaining friend on the world stage, leaving Britain isolated and alone.

“The solution is clear: an exit from Brexit and a divorce from Trump.”

By Jo Swinson

Number 10 hinted earlier today that Northern Ireland could stay in the customs union to prevent the return of a hard border, saying the issue would be a matter for the negotiations.

However, Downing Street then backtracked around forty minutes later, saying the government’s policy has not changed and the UK will leave the single market and customs union.

It comes as Theresa May attends a crucial meeting in Brussels with EU Council President Donald Tusk.

Theresa May’s Brexit plans have descended into utter chaos on the same day she’s trying to secure a breakthrough in negotiations with the EU.

The simplest way to solve the issue of the Northern Ireland border would be for the UK to stay in the single market and customs union in the long term.

Ministers must change course and stop recklessly ruling this out as an option

The Liberal Democrat  leader Vince Cable has reacted to the Budget yesterday, in which is was announced that Britain has sunk down the international league table for growth.

Vince Cable has said,

Today’s Budget saw the UK slip from the top of the growth league to deep into the relegation zone. Each person in Britain is set to be £687 worse off per year compared to forecasts before the election.

And as living standards are squeezed, the Government is setting aside £3.7bn to cover the cost of a ‘no deal’ Brexit.

The Chancellor found more money in the Budget to plan for Brexit than he did for our struggling NHS, schools and police.

And the Labour Party are little better and their support for Brexit makes their fantasy economics all the more unrealistic.

A Liberal Democrat budget would have looked very different today. Founded on a vision of a high-tech, high-skilled economy that is green, open and entrepreneurial.

We would invest £6bn per year in our NHS & Social Care system, paid for by a penny on income tax. And Lib Dems would kick-start the economy back to growth with productive investment of £100bn over ten years to build more homes and infrastructure for the next generation.

Today’s Budget reinforces our belief that Britain is better off in Europe. We are fighting to remain in the Single Market and the Customs Union, and to give the people a vote on the final Brexit deal.

As more facts emerge, the public must be given a chance to Exit from Brexit.

You can also read about the main budget failures here.

The Dunfermline Liberal Democrats have welcomed Vince Cable as new leader. Cable became new leader today and takes charge in turbulent times for the UK.

Dunfermline South Councillor and local Party Convenor James Calder has commented,

Vince Cable provides the experience and gravitas that is required by our politicians at such a turbulent time. With Brexit negotiations being handled disastrously so far by Theresa May’s Tories, he will keep the Government on its toes.

Vince not only has a wealth of political experience, but is also a well renowned economist. I am sure that he will provide an excellent guiding hand as leader of the Liberal Democrats.

Willie Rennie and Bryn Jones are campaigning for better education

The SNP have come under fire as Scotland’s schools have recorded their worst ever performance in an international survey of pupils.

Scotland’s scores for maths, reading and science have all declined in the latest PISA figures. Lib Dem leader Willie Rennie said, “After 10 years of SNP rule, we are not even as good as England anymore.”

The Liberal Democrats propose a ‘Penny for Education’ to support a Pupil Premium, an expansion in nursery education, reversal of college cuts and stopping school cuts.

Mr Rennie said: “Liberal Democrats have an ambitious plan to get Scotland back on track by making the biggest investment in education since devolution.”

Prospective Council Candidate Bryn Jones brings the campaign to Dunfermline North. Bryn says, “Scottish parents expect world leading schools. As a father and a council candidate, it is my ambition to see Scotland rise up the rankings and be the best in the world.”

James at the Queen Margaret Hospital

James at the Queen Margaret Hospital

James Calder, prospective Parliamentary candidate for Dunfermline has called for better investment in NHS Fife. Deficiencies have included a big shortage of GPs in Fife leading to long waiting times for patients.

James has commented, “Under the SNP, the NHS in Scotland has gone backwards, is underfunded and has not had the care it needs. Frontline staff in NHS Fife have been doing  fantastic job considering the limited resources they have, but I call on the Scottish Government to do more to help them.”

“We need a Scottish Government that will do more –  people in Fife and Scotland deserve better!”

Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie also mentioned, “I have conducted a survey of all GPs and have raised the issue with the First Minister in Parliament. I believe the SNP took their eye off the ball and I am backing a plan to recruit over 700 GPs in 5 years.”


Last week the Liberal Democrat Autumn Conference took place in Bournemouth. The first Conference since both the General Election and also the election of Tim Farron as our new Party Leader, this featured inspiring speeches from a number of figures, including of course Tim as well as Scottish Lib Dem leader Willie Rennie.With Britain facing illiberal Governments in both Westminster and Holyrood, the theme of the Conference naturally focussed on the importance of liberalism and the Liberal Democrats in a society where the politics of division and fear were allowed to take centre stage in the General Election.

Tim Farron, in his first Conference speech since becoming Party Leader, discussed a number of topics, including his own background to becoming a Liberal, our contribution in the last Government, the importance on speaking up for the poor and disadvantaged, the upcoming EU referendum and the current refugee crisis.

Tim noted our Government achievements, including lifting millions of the poorest workers out of income tax altogether, legalising same-sex marriage, free school meals for millions of children and of course helping to make Britain the fastest growing economy in the G7.

After he continued to mention where we as Liberal Democrats are looking to achieve in the future – including improving rail infrastructure, increasing affordable housing, having Britain take a more liberal and caring stance towards refugees, working towards keeping Britain in the EU in the upcoming referendum, supporting green initiatives and of course making sure we are in a position of power to ensure a Liberal future.

You can watch Tim’s speech in the video above.

Willie Rennie’s speech focussed on a number of issues facing Scotland currently. This includes failures in Scotland’s mental health services, policing and education under the SNP Government, as well as the SNP’s illiberal plans for the Super ID database. He then continued to discuss Liberal Democrat plans for the 2016 Scottish election. This includes getting Mental Health taken seriously, restoring democracy to Scottish policing, empowering public sector workers and bringing childcare and the Pupil Premium to those who need it.

You can read Willie’s speech on this link.

James Calder

James Calder

When the Conservative Government decided not to include repealing the Human Rights Act in this year’s Queen’s Speech, I did feel a sense of some relief. For so many reasons, as I will outline here, the Human Rights Act offers the British people a number of absolutely essential protections and safeguards against the worst excesses that a Government can inflight. However, my sense of relief has been tempered by the fact that this seems to be a temporary victory – with the right wing tabloids screaming sensationalist headlines such as the Daily Mail saying it is opposed by ‘Left Wing Luvvies’. It seems to be only a matter of time until the Tories bring this up again, and we need to bring a stronger understanding of the positive effects this Act has on our society.

The origins of the Human Rights Act come from the 1950s, when Winston Churchill helped lead the way in setting up the European Convention of Human Rights. Britain was the first to sign this, and ironically it was a Conservative Government that helped lead the way in setting up this ground-breaking agreement. A few years later, the European Court of Human Rights was established.

It was only in 1998 that British judges and the Government had to take into account the decisions of the Court when it came to lawmaking. This came after the Human Rights Act, which ensured that the human rights of British residents would be guaranteed. The law ensured when legislation was made, it had to take into account the decisions made by the European Court of Human Rights, and judges had to take this into the account in legal cases. As such, in effect a constitutional guarantee of human rights was made in the UK.

However, opposition for the Human Rights Act has come in the form of an authoritarian, right wing nature.

One of the key charges that has been made is that the Human Rights Act places limits on national sovereignty. It is a sad state of affairs when national sovereignty is put as more important than our rights. The fact the Government has to take into account our Human Rights, which the ECHR for designed for, to me is something to be celebrated. If that means a small sacrifice in national sovereignty on what are ultimately matters which are not going to seriously impact on national security, I think that this can only be a good thing. We cannot simply think that the Government will always take a benign interest in safeguarding our rights; the ‘Snoopers’ charter can testify to that. Democracies can and will abuse human rights if there is no constraints, shown by the actions of the USA at Guantanamo Bay.

The other charge, that it helps foreign criminals, is a deeply sad excuse to try and distract from the bigger issues. While the Human Rights Act has been used in some cases by foreign criminals, this argument has only applied to small number of situations. The vast majority of foreign nationals who are ordered to be deported are deported. However, more fundamentally, are criminals not human as well? Should we not ensure, for instance, that those who face being tortured in their home country are safe? Churchill has stated that societies attitude towards its criminals is the measure of “the stored up strength of a nation.” These are wise words, and we should take this into account.

Fundamentally however, there are so many arguments in favour of the Act. Currently Britain leads the world when it comes to the promotion of Human Rights. There are so many countries where people do not have the same freedoms as we have, and it has taken centuries for us to develop these rights. The Human Rights Act is part of that process, and not only is repealing it a regressive and reactionary measure, but it sends the signal internationally to those countries that do not respect Human Rights that their actions are acceptable.

The Human Rights Act also gives our citizens the right to take their case to the British courts. Before this Act, in the situation where the British state was breaking our human rights, we would have to go to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. This made things more difficult for the individual and the state. Now for the most part, our courts can handle the situation, and we can ensure our rights are respected without the same difficulties as before.

The Human Rights Act ensures that the British State has to act in a fair and just manner. In so many ways, our civil liberties are under attack at the moment. The Tories want to scrap this Act and bring in the ‘Snoopers’ Charter to spy on citizens. The SNP are bringing in equally Orwellian legislation in Scotland such as the Super ID database and their centralising agenda. Human Rights are a cherished part of our society, and we must continue to campaign hard to keep them safe.

James Calder

By Tom Leatherland

As you will probably know, we’ve got just two MP’s vying to lead our party after Nick Clegg has stepped down as leader. With typical Libdem openness, the two of them are participating in a series of hustings events across the UK, before members votes have to be in by the 15th July.

There was an excellent turnout of members for the Edinburgh hustings, including a good group from Dunfermline, which included at least one member who’s joined since the election. The format of the hustings was simple: each candidate gave a 10 minute presentation, with the other out of the room, and then both answered a series of questions from the floor for the balance of the two hours scheduled.

I guess I’m not alone in having seen more of Tim Farron than Norman Lamb, over the last few years, simply because Tim was our Party President. Then on Friday evening, Norman was on the BBC Radio 4 ‘Any Questions’ programme to which I paid particular attention. He gave several excellent answers which were very well received by the London audience. I was impressed. His leadership bid is also backed by Baroness Shirley Williams who I’ve seen many times, and hold in high regard. I was realising what a strong leadership candidate he is, and he’s clearly well regarded within his Norfolk constituency, as well as by all those who know him for his work in promoting the cause of treating mental health problems.

Tim Farron’s leadership bid is backed by Willie Rennie – another whom I hold in high regard and who has demonstrated sound judgement. So I was paying attention to what both had to say at the hustings. Both gave powerful, liberal, opening addresses. That really didn’t help differentiate them.

Then came the questions, and what a good array of searching questions on widely differing subjects they were, covering personal, political and policy issues. Back came the answers; good liberal answers from them both, but nuances and delivery styles were inevitably different. Both clearly recognised the threat of climate change and renewables, but steered clear of the tricky issue of nuclear power (my views on that may differ from the Party’s!). During the course of the morning, my feeling that we’ve got two strong leadership contenders was confirmed, and I learned a bit more about the background of both of them. Our party should be safe with either of them, but I have to make a choice and cast my vote for one of them.

The Conservatives have set out plans to abolish the Human Rights Act and the Lib Dems are leading the campaign to stop them from doing this.

The Human Rights Act helps ensures our fundamental rights are protected and prevents the Government from disregarding these. Examples of protections offered include:

the right to life;
the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment;
the prohibition of slavery and forced labour;
the right to liberty and security of the person;
the right to a fair trial;
prohibition of punishment without law;
the right to respect for private and family life;
the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion;
the right to freedom of expression;
the right to freedom of assembly and association;
the right for men and women to marry and found a family;
the right to peaceful enjoyment of personal property;
the right to education;
the right to free elections;
and the prohibition of discrimination.

If you want to support the Lib Dem campaign to keep our human rights then please sign the petition here.